This post is also available in:
How does the petition work?
The prohaltefrist.de initiative is currently preparing a public ePetition to the German Bundestag.
Planned Process
1. Submission of the Petition
The petition was submitted on May 30, 2026.
2. Review by the Petitions Committee
After submission, the Petitions Committee of the German Bundestag reviews:
- whether the petition is admissible,
- whether it meets the formal requirements,
- and whether it will be published as a public ePetition.
This review typically takes approximately: 2 to 3 weeks
We currently expect possible publication:
approximately from June 14, 2026
3. Public Co-Signing Phase
As soon as the petition is activated, the official signing period begins.
From this point, we have:
a total of 6 weeks
to mobilize as many supporters as possible.
Why are 30,000 co-signers important?
If the threshold of:
30,000 co-signers
is reached within the co-signing period, the Petitions Committee may conduct a public hearing.
This gives the issue:
- significantly more political attention,
- public visibility,
- as well as official consideration in the German Bundestag.
Where is the petition signed?
The petition is co-signed exclusively through the official platform of the German Bundestag.
Once the petition has been published, we will post the direct link here on prohaltefrist.de as well as through our communication channels.
Petition Text
Title of the Petition
Preservation of the Tax-Exempt Holding Period for Private Disposal Transactions with Crypto Assets (Especially Bitcoin)
Text of the Petition
The petition calls for the preservation of the tax-exempt holding period for private disposal transactions with crypto assets (such as Bitcoin) under Section 23 of the German Income Tax Act (EStG). In particular, the one-year holding period, after which gains are tax-free, should not be abolished. Furthermore, it demands that the classification of crypto assets as “other economic goods” according to current administrative practice and case law be expressly maintained.
Justification (Summary)
The existing regulation ensures legal certainty for private investors, promotes long-term and responsible wealth building and personal retirement planning, and strengthens Germany as a location for innovation and business in the field of digital assets.
A change or abolition of the holding period or the current tax classification would lead to significant legal uncertainty, substantially hinder necessary private wealth building and personal retirement planning, and disadvantage Germany in international competition.
The necessity of this petition is based on essential procedural, economic, and bureaucratic arguments:
- Legal Certainty, Protection of Legitimate Expectations, and Private Retirement Planning
Citizens who have invested in crypto assets based on the current legal framework and established tax court case law rely on the dependability of the tax system. A retroactive elimination of the holding period would constitute a serious breach of the protection of legitimate expectations. Moreover, many small savers and private investors use Bitcoin and other crypto assets as instruments for long-term wealth building and private retirement planning. Those who hold digital assets for more than one year are not acting as short-term speculators, but as long-term investors. This form of personal retirement planning should be politically supported and not penalized through additional tax barriers.
- Securing Germany’s Competitiveness
The current tax exemption after twelve months makes Germany one of the most attractive and innovative locations for crypto investors and blockchain companies in Europe. Abolishing the holding period would represent a massive international competitive disadvantage. While countries like Switzerland leave crypto gains in private assets tax-free anyway and states like Portugal or the Czech Republic offer attractive holding periods, a tightening in Germany would drive capital, highly innovative Web3 companies, and skilled workers abroad.
- Reducing Bureaucracy and Relieving Tax Authorities
The existing one-year holding period functions not only as an investment incentive, but above all as a significant administrative simplification. If all transactions had to be declared regardless of holding period in the future, this would lead to immense documentation effort for millions of savers (e.g., through complex FIFO calculations across multiple wallets). Tax authorities would also face bureaucratic overload, as they would have to review countless micro-transactions and crypto reports, which would be disproportionate to actual tax revenues.
Maintaining the current practice thus protects citizens’ financial self-determination, prevents emigration, and avoids new, paralyzing administrative burdens.
As of May 30, 2026




